Quote:Originally posted by Scott Tarr:paw states:quote:I'm a big fan of Photoshop, particularly v5.5 and 7 (6 sucked). View image: /infopop/emoticons/icon_frown.gif Instead, they make a great product with shit wrapped all over it. And there's not even a fill tool (or a shortcut).And there's that eternal View image: 128-128-128 color that can't be adjusted in the background.If only Adobe would pull its head out of its ass, they might make a decent interface. Then there's the way the tool bar is grouped-the paint bucket is grouped with the gradient tool while the hand tool is practically useless. A postage stamp is larger than what Photoslop shows on a high-res monitor. And don't get me started on the 'Preview' screen. Even the keyboard shortcuts aren't fully explored. View image: /infopop/emoticons/icon_wink.gifThe interface is atrocious, IMO. Does this mean one would want to drive a Model T as a daily machine? I would think not. But a Model T works too (if it's been maintained). As for the interface being terrible, maybe it doesn't have all the newfangled doohickeys in Macromedia apps but it works pretty damn welSure, it works. Paw states:quote:I'm a big fan of Photoshop, particularly v5.5 and 7 (6 sucked).

On the other hand, pixel-based images allow for more realistic images, whereas vectors will (most of the time) look computer-generated. For example, you can resize vector images to any size and they'll always look the same, not so with pixel-based. You can also convert CDR into many other file formats.Quote:Originally posted by Jammer53:quote:vector-based Can you define please?J53 View image: /infopop/emoticons/icon_cool.gifVector : CorelDraw (& Trace), Illustrator, FreehandPixel : Corel Photo-Paint, Photoshop (derivatives), Paintshop Pro, GIMP, et al.Vector-based means that it creates an image in a connect-the-dots type of way, all you're really doing is specifying where the dots go and which dots are connected with lines and/or curves (Each has its' own advantages & drawbacks.

Corel to photoshop